PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 455, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226 PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 455, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STRONG v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226 STRONG v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 456, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 155 F. Supp. 468.

James F. Connolly for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney and Herman Marcuse for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 356 U.S. 226, 227