LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. CO. V. SCOTT, 219 U. S. 209 (1911)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 219 U. S. 209
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/219/209/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/219/209/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Scott
No. 286
Argued October 19, 20, 1910
Decided January 3, 1911
219 U.S. 209
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
Decided on authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, ante, p. 219 U. S. 186.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE LURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. Like that case, it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack Amendment of the Act to Regulate Commerce.
The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.
Affirmed.