PACIFIC POSTAL TEL. CABLE CO. V. O'CONNOR, 128 U. S. 394 (1888)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 128 U. S. 394
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/128/394/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/128/394/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. O'Connor, 128 U.S. 394 (1888)
Pacific Postal Telegraph Cable Company v. O'Connor
No. 1282
Submitted November 12, 1888
Decided November 19, 1888
128 U.S. 394
Syllabus
A remittitur, in a judgment on a verdict, of all sums in excess of $5,000, made on the day following entry of the judgment on motion of plaintiff's counsel in the absence of defendant or his counsel, is no abuse of the discretion of the court.
Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The case is stated in the opinion.