Tollett v. Henderson
411 U.S. 258 (1973)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973)

Tollett v. Henderson

No. 72-95

Argued February 20, 1973

Decided April 17, 1973

411 U.S. 258

Syllabus

Where a state criminal defendant, on advice of counsel, pleads guilty, he cannot, in a federal habeas corpus proceeding, raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that antedated the plea, Brady v. United States,397 U. S. 742, such as infirmities in the grand jury selection process, but may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea by showing that counsel's advice was not within the standards of McMann v. Richardson,397 U. S. 759. Pp. 411 U. S. 261-269.

459 F.2d 237, reversed and remanded.

REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, WHITE, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS and BRENNAN, JJ., joined, post, p. 411 U. S. 269.

Page 411 U. S. 259

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.