PRONER v. UNITED STATES
395 U.S. 823 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PRONER v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

395 U.S. 823

PRONER v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1022.
Decided June 23, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 405 F.2d 943, vacated and remanded.

Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Benton v. Maryland, ante, p. 784.


ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/395/823/case.html">395 U.S. 823</a> (1969) 395 U.S. 823 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

395 U.S. 823

ANDERSON ET AL. v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. No. 1414.
Decided June 23, 1969.

436 S. W. 2d 533, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Michael Avedisian for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 395 U.S. 823, 824




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.