Boulden v. HolmanAnnotate this Case
394 U.S. 478 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
Boulden v. Holman, 394 U.S. 478 (1969)
Boulden v. Holman
Argued February 26, 1969
Decided April 2, 1969
394 U.S. 478
Petitioner was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death in accordance with the jury's verdict. After the conviction was affirmed by the Alabama Supreme Court, petitioner requested federal habeas corpus relief on the ground that the introduction of a confession into evidence at his trial (which antedated Escobedo v. Illinois,378 U. S. 478, and Miranda v. Arizona,384 U. S. 436) violated his constitutional rights. After a full hearing, the District Court found the confession voluntary and the Court of Appeals affirmed. In his brief in this Court, petitioner raised the question whether the jury that sentenced him to death was selected in accordance with the principles recently announced in Witherspoon v. Illinois,391 U. S. 510.
1. The lower courts' holding that petitioner's confession was voluntary is justified. Pp. 394 U. S. 479-481.
2. Since several veniremen were excused for cause apparently because they voiced general objections to the death penalty, it appears that the sentence of death cannot constitutionally stand under Witherspoon, supra, and the cause is remanded to the District Court, where this belated issue may be fully considered. Pp. 394 U. S. 481-484.
385 F.2d 102, vacated and remanded.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.