SHAW v. GARRISON
393 U.S. 220 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SHAW v. GARRISON, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

393 U.S. 220

SHAW v. GARRISON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 579.
Decided December 9, 1968.

Affirmed.

Herve Racivitch for appellant.

Eberhard P. Deutsch and Rene H. Himel, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


LANDRY v. BOYLE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/220/case.html">393 U.S. 220</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 220 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANDRY v. BOYLE, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

393 U.S. 220

LANDRY ET AL. v. BOYLE, CHIEF JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 659.
Decided December 9, 1968.

280 F. Supp. 938, appeal dismissed.

Robert L. Tucker, R. Eugene Pincham, Jean F. Williams, Leonard Karlin, William M. Kunstler, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 13 (1).

Page 393 U.S. 220, 221




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.