ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH
393 U.S. 127 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, 393 U.S. 127 (1968)

393 U.S. 127

ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v.
LETH, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 417.
Decided November 12, 1968.

292 F. Supp. 615, affirmed.

Thomas H. Tongue for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/127/case.html">393 U.S. 127</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 127 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, 393 U.S. 127 (1968)

393 U.S. 127

DOOLIN, DBA NATIONAL NOVELTY CO., ET AL.
v. KORSHAK, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 439.
Decided November 12, 1968.

39 Ill. 2d 521, 236 N. E. 2d 897, appeal dismissed.

Owen Rall for appellants.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 127, 128

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.