STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES
389 U.S. 574 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 574 (1968)

389 U.S. 574

STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 839.
Decided January 15, 1968.

274 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.

Ralph W. Currie and Ewell H. Muse, Jr., for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Phillip Robinson for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


KIRK v. GONG, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/574/case.html">389 U.S. 574</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 574 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KIRK v. GONG, 389 U.S. 574 (1968)

389 U.S. 574

KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL. v. GONG ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF FLORIDA. No. 872.
Decided January 15, 1968.

278 F. Supp. 133, affirmed.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Thomas C. Britton, Stuart Simon, D. P. S. Paul and P. D. Thomson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 574, 575




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.