GLOUNER v. SUPERIOR CT. CALIFORNIA, CTY. LOS ANGELES
385 U.S. 451 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

GLOUNER v. SUPERIOR CT. CALIFORNIA, CTY. LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 451 (1967)

385 U.S. 451

GLOUNER ET AL. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT.

No. 756.
Decided January 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

Hyman Goldman for appellants.

R. B. Pegram, W. H. Peterson and Jack M. Miller for the State of California, real party in interest.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOGART v. TRAYNOR, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/451/case.html">385 U.S. 451</a> (1967) 385 U.S. 451 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOGART v. TRAYNOR, 385 U.S. 451 (1967)

385 U.S. 451

BOGART v. TRAYNOR, CHIEF JUSTICE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 767, Misc.
Decided January 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. The request for other relief is also denied.

Page 385 U.S. 451, 452




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.