KADANS v. DICKERSON
382 U.S. 22 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

KADANS v. DICKERSON, 382 U.S. 22 (1965)

382 U.S. 22

KADANS v. DICKERSON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 399, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Joseph M. Kadans, appellant, pro se.

Paul C. Parraguirre for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 382 U.S. 22, 23


MALLORY v. NORTH CAROLINA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/22/case.html">382 U.S. 22</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 22 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MALLORY v. NORTH CAROLINA, 382 U.S. 22 (1965)

382 U.S. 22

MALLORY ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 81, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

263 N.C. 536, 139 S. E. 2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Walter S. Haffner for appellants.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.