SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
375 U.S. 57 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

375 U.S. 57

SOUTH COAST FISHERIES, INC., ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 372.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 213 Cal. App. 2d 325, 28 Cal. Rptr. 537.

John J. Real for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Neal J. Gobar, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/57/case.html">375 U.S. 57</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 57 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

375 U.S. 57

ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 424.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 362 S. W. 2d 159.

John D. Richardson for appellant.

Lamar Carnes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 57, 58




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.