DEITLE v. UNITED STATES
364 U.S. 284 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

DEITLE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 284 (1960)

364 U.S. 284

DEITLE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 759, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 274 F.2d 117.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing at which petitioner should be present.


De GROAT v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/284/case.html">364 U.S. 284</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 284 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

De GROAT v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 284 (1960)

364 U.S. 284

De GROAT v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 956, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 8 App. Div. 2d 664, 185 N. Y. S. 2d 775.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 364 U.S. 284, 285




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.