SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN
363 U.S. 143 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN, 363 U.S. 143 (1960)

363 U.S. 143

SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 620.
Decided May 31, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 146 Conn. 531, 153 A. 2d 415.

Raymond T. Benedict, Morgan P. Ames, Francis J. McNamara, Jr. and John F. Spindler for appellant.

Ira E. Hicks, Norwick R. G. Goodspeed, John C. Sturges and Samuel A. Gilliland for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/363/143/case.html">363 U.S. 143</a> (1960) 363 U.S. 143 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, 363 U.S. 143 (1960)

363 U.S. 143

GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 799, Misc.
Decided May 31, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 29 N. J. 506, 150 A. 2d 291.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 363 U.S. 143, 144




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.