NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY
361 U.S. 534 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

361 U.S. 534

NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 563.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.

Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, <a href="/cases/federal/us/361/534/case.html">361 U.S. 534</a> (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

361 U.S. 534

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.

Herbert M. Brune for appellant.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 534, 535




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.