BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE
359 U.S. 28 (1959)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE, 359 U.S. 28 (1959)

359 U.S. 28

BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 142.
Decided March 2, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 234 La. 651, 101 So.2d 70.

Harry McCall for appellant.

Robert L. Roland for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/28/case.html">359 U.S. 28</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 28 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, 359 U.S. 28 (1959)

359 U.S. 28

E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 524.
Decided March 2, 1959.

248 N.C. 560, 104 S. E. 2d 403, affirmed.

Kester Walton and James H. Epps, Jr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, and Williams v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc., 358 U.S. 450.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in these cases.

Page 359 U.S. 28, 29




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.