United States v. Willow River Power Co.
324 U.S. 499 (1945)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Willow River Power Co., 324 U.S. 499 (1945)

United States v. Willow River Power Co.

No. 312

Argued February 8, 9, 1945

Decided March 26, 1945

324 U.S. 499

Syllabus

1. An owner of a dam and hydroelectric plant near the confluence of navigable and nonnavigable streams, and embracing land riparian to the navigable stream, is not entitled under the Fifth Amendment to compensation from the United States for a reduction in the generating capacity of the plant which resulted from an authorized navigation improvement that raised the level of the water of the navigable stream above ordinary high water mark. United States v. Cress,243 U. S. 316, distinguished. Pp. 324 U. S. 504, 324 U. S. 506.

2. The resulting damage to the riparian owner in this case did not constitute such a taking of property as is required by the Fifth Amendment to be compensated. P. 324 U. S. 510.

101 Ct.Cl. 222 reversed.

Certiorari, 323 U.S. 694, to review a judgment for the plaintiff in a suit against the United States to recover compensation for an alleged taking of property.

Page 324 U. S. 500

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.