Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher
306 U.S. 167 (1939)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U.S. 167 (1939)

Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher

No. 212

Argued December 12, 1938

Decided January 30, 1939

306 U.S. 167

Syllabus

1. California tax on storage and use -- i.e., upon retention and exercise of ownership -- may be applied consistently with the commerce clause and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to an interstate railroad company in respect of supplies purchased outside of the State and brought in for prompt application in the operation of its road, such as office supplies, and rails, equipment, machinery, tools, etc., used in replacements, repairs, and extensions, and including articles ordered out of the State on specifications suitable only for use in the transportation facilities and installed immediately upon arrival at the California destination. P. 306 U. S. 172.

2. There is an interval after the articles have reached the end of their interstate movement and before their consumption in interstate operation has begun when the "use and storage" are subject to local taxation. Helson & Randolph v. Kentucky,279 U. S. 245, distinguished. P. 306 U. S. 176.

23 F.Supp. 193 affirmed.

Appeal from a decree of a three-judge district court refusing a permanent injunction and dismissing the bill in a suit to restrain enforcement of the California Use Tax. The court below had at first granted an interlocutory injunction, 20 F.Supp. 940.

Page 306 U. S. 170

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.