Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm'n
285 U.S. 119 (1932)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm'n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932)

Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Commission

No. 337

Argued January 14, 1932

Decided February 29, 1932

285 U.S. 119

Syllabus

1. Where a corporation selling natural gas locally procures its supply by agreement in interstate commerce from a pipeline company with which it is so affiliated that the two are not at arm's length in their dealings, the reasonableness of the interstate price is subject to be inquired into by state authority when applied to be the local company for permission to increase its local rate. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.,282 U. S. 133. P. 285 U. S. 123.

2. A local distributor of natural gas, in a common corporate control with an interstate pipeline company from which it brought its supply in interstate commerce, sought to enjoin the enforcement of a local rate in a particular city which the state commission had declined to increase without proof that the interstate price was reasonable.

Held:

(1) Adjudications upholding the same wholesale rate in relation to other cities of the state, in suits to which the city now in question was not a party, do not make a prima facie case here. P. 285 U. S. 125.

Page 285 U. S. 120

(2) Undenied allegations to the effect that the distributor, though it has tried, cannot obtain its supply otherwise or at a lower price than from the pipeline company, that that the same price is charged by that and other lines to other distributors, do not establish the reasonableness of the price in this case in view of the affiliation of the two companies. P. 285 U. S. 125.

(3) In view of the relations of the two corporations and the power implicit therein arbitrarily to fix and maintain costs, as respects the distributing company, which do not represent the true value of the service rendered, the state authority is entitled to a fair showing of the reasonableness of such costs, although this may involve a presentation of evidence which would not be required in the case of parties dealing at arm's length and in the general and open market. P. 285 U. S. 126.

Affirmed.

Appeal from a decree of the district court of three judges dismissing a bill to enjoin a state commission and a city from enforcing local rates for gas alleged to have become confiscatory.

Page 285 U. S. 121

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.