MILLS v. JOHNSON
215 U.S. 590

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLS v. JOHNSON, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

215 U.S. 590

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.
No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446, 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78, 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405, 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.