BOGART v. REAGAN, 386 U.S. 211 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BOGART v. REAGAN, 386 U.S. 211 (1967) 386 U.S. 211BOGART v. REAGAN, GOVERNOR OF
CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL
DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1044, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1967.
Appeal dismissed.
Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se.
Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The request for other relief is denied.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1044, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1967.
Appeal dismissed. Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se. Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The request for other relief is denied. Page 386 U.S. 211, 212
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BOGART v. REAGAN, 386 U.S. 211 (1967) 386 U.S. 211 (1967) 386 U.S. 211 386 U.S. 211"> BOGART v. REAGAN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1044, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1967.
Appeal dismissed. Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se. Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The request for other relief is denied. Page 386 U.S. 211, 212
Search This Case
