Sohn Manufacturing Inc. v. LIRC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
2014 WI 112 SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: OF WISCONSIN 2012AP2566 Sohn Manufacturing Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, Secura Insurance, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Labor and Industry Review Commission and Tanya Wetor, Defendants-Respondents. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS (Reported at 350 Wis. 2d 469, 838 N.W.2d 131) (Ct. App. 2013 Published) PDC No.: 2013 WI App 112 OPINION FILED: SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: October 7, 2014 September 23, 2014 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: Sheboygan Circuit Terence T. Bourke JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs by Steven A. Nigh, Charles B. Palmer, Denise L. Greathouse, Kelly R. Rourke, and Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Waukesha. Oral argument by Steven A. Nigh. For the Commission, defendant-respondent the cause was argued Labor by and Anthony Industry D. Review Russomanno, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general. 2014 WI 112 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2012AP2566 (L.C. No. 2011CV1015) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT Sohn Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, FILED Secura Insurance, Plaintiff-Appellant, OCT 7, 2014 v. Labor and Industry Review Commission and Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Supreme Court Tanya Wetor, Defendants-Respondents. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. Affirmed. The court is evenly divided upon the question of affirmance or reversal. That results in affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals and thus of the Labor and Industry Review Commission. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm. Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J. Gableman would No. reverse. Justice David T. Prosser did not 2012AP2566 participate. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. 2 No. 1 2012AP2566
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
