Wisconsin Realtors Assoc. v. Town of West Point
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
2007 WI 139 SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: OF WISCONSIN 2006AP2761 Wisconsin Realtors Association, Inc. and Wisconsin Builders Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Town of West Point, Defendant-Respondent. ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILED: SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: December 12, 2007 November 29, 2007 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: Circuit Columbia Andrew P. Bissonnette JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: ZIEGLER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellants there were briefs by Timothy D. Fenner, Lori M. Lubinsky, and Axley Brynelson, LLP, Madison, and oral argument by Lori M. Lubinsky. For the defendant-respondent there was a brief by Richard K Nordeng, Bryan Kleinmaier, and Stafford Rosenbaum LLP, Madison, and oral argument by Richard K. Nordeng. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Carol B. Shawano, on behalf of the Wisconsin Towns Association. Nawrocki, An amicus curiae brief was filed by Daniel M. Olson, Madison, on behalf of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Brian Ohm, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Chapter of the American Planning Association and the American Planning Association. An amicus curiae brief was filed by William White, Paul D. Barbato, and Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Transportation Builders Association and Aggregate Producers of Wisconsin. 2 2007 WI 139 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2006AP2761 (L.C. No. 2006CV96) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT Wisconsin Realtors Association, Inc. and Wisconsin Builders Association, FILED Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEC 12, 2007 Town of West Point, David R. Schanker Clerk of Supreme Court Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Columbia County, Andrew P. Bissonnette, Judge. Order granting certification vacated and cause remanded to court of appeals. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case comes before the court on certification from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. ¶2 reverse The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or the judgment of the circuit court. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice Patience Drake Roggensack would affirm. Justice N. Patrick Crooks, Justice David T. Prosser, and Justice Louis B. Butler, No. Jr. would reverse on the grounds that neither 2006AP2761 Wis. Stat. § 236.45 nor Wis. Stat. § 61.34 provide the Town the authority to enact a moratorium on land division. Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler did not participate. ¶3 When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule but declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue). ¶4 Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals. By the Court. The order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals. ¶5 Justice ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER did not participate. 2 No. 1 2006AP2761
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
