Worthington v. Farmers Ins. Exchange

Annotate this Case

64 Wis. 2d 108 (1974)

218 N.W.2d 373

WORTHINGTON, Respondent, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellant.

No. 108.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Submitted May 8, 1974.

Decided June 4, 1974.

*109 The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of Arnold, Murray & O'Neill, attorneys, and James P. O'Neill of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and for the respondent on the brief of Cook & Franke, S. C., attorneys, and Francis R. Croak and Robert L. Elliott of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 May 8, 1974.

WILKIE, J.

The issue that is dispositive of this appeal is whether the order directing arbitration in this case is appealable.

It is always the duty of this court in considering any appeal to resolve, even sua sponte, the initial question of whether the order involved on the appeal is, in fact, appealable, because, of course, this goes to the very jurisdiction of the court to hear the appeal.[1]

Under the terms of sec. 298.15, Stats., an order to proceed with arbitration is not appealable. That section provides as follows:

"298.15 Appeal from order or judgment. An appeal may be taken from an order confirming, modifying, correcting *110 or vacating an award, or from a judgment entered upon an award, as from an order or judgment in an action."

In a recent case we held

". . . Under the construction given the statute, such issues [any and all objections to referral and award] may be raised by either party, following the resort to arbitration, but not before."[2]

By the Court.Appeal dismissed.

NOTES

[1] In re Interest of F. R. W. (a minor) (1973), 61 Wis. 2d 193, 212 N.W.2d 130; Gallagher v. Schernecker (1973), 60 Wis. 2d 143, 208 N.W.2d 437; Teamsters Union Local 695 v. Waukesha County (1973), 57 Wis. 2d 62, 203 N.W.2d 707; Estate of Hillery (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 689, 696, 176 N.W.2d 376.

[2] Teamsters Union Local 695 v. Waukesha County, supra, footnote 1, at page 70.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.