State v. Powell
Annotate this CaseState v. Powell (98-303); 168 Vt. 636; 725 A.2d 301 [Filed 21-Dec-1998] ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 98-303 DECEMBER TERM, 1998 STATE OF VERMONT } APPEALED FROM: } } v. } Vermont District Court } Unit No. 1, Windham Circuit PETER J. POWELL } } DOCKET NO. 1492-09-97 WmCr In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter: Defendant's counsel in this criminal case seeks to appeal from the district court's order denying his motion to withdraw. Because the order he seeks to appeal from is not a final appealable order, the appeal is dismissed. See, In re Burlington Bagel Bakery, 150 Vt. 20, 21 (1988) (final and appealable order must end litigation on merits or conclusively determine rights of parties, leaving nothing for court to do but execute judgment); Messih v. Lee Drug, Inc., 220 Cal. Rptr. 43, 45 (Ct. App. 1985) (ruling on attorney's motion to withdraw is nonappealable interim order); cf., Chaker v. Chaker, 147 Vt. 548, 548-48 n.* (1986) (applying V.R.A.P. 2 to review as interlocutory appeal trial court's ruling on attorney's motion to withdraw); 19 J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice 202.11 [8][b], at 61 (3d ed. 1998) (given related decisions by United States Supreme Court, orders denying disqualification of attorneys in criminal cases are most likely not appealable under final judgment rule). BY THE COURT: _______________________________________ Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Chief Justice _______________________________________ John A. Dooley, Associate Justice _______________________________________ James L. Morse, Associate Justice _______________________________________ Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice _______________________________________ Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.