State v. Bagnes
Annotate this CaseAppellant was convicted of lewdness involving a child and sexual exploitation of a minor by distribution of child pornography for dropping his pants in front of two young girls, exposing a toddler-sized diaper he was wearing, and in distributing a flyer containing images of children and adolescents wearing diapers. On appeal, Appellant argued, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. The Supreme Court agreed and reversed, holding that, while Appellant’s conduct was deplorable and socially inappropriate, it did not fall to the level of criminal lewdness or sexual exploitation under the criminal definition of those terms as clarified in this opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.