EX PARTE DENNIS RAY ETHEL (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 
OF TEXAS 

NOS. WR-66,517-01 & -02 
EX PARTE DENNIS RAY ETHEL, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NOS. 15014B & 15016B IN THE 12TH DISTRICT COURT 
FROM GRIMES COUNTY 
Per curiam.O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery and sentenced to two terms of ninety-two years' imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Ethel v. State, Nos. 14-04-00093-CR & 14-04-00094-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.).

On February 7, 2007, we remanded these applications and directed the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. On July 25, 2007, we reminded the trial court in a letter that its findings and conclusions were due on June 7, 2007. After granting the trial court a sixty-day extension, we sent a second reminder letter to the trial court on September 16, 2008. On November 20, 2008, we then received Applicant's motions for an indefinite extension of time. We denied his motions in a written order and explained that he was not precluded from supplementing and amending his applications on remand and that the trial court did not have a ministerial duty to make findings and conclusions on his supplemental claims. Finally, on March 11, 2009, we issued a third order directing the trial court to make and forward its findings and conclusions to this Court within 60 days of the date of the order.

On May 5th, we received a supplemental record, but no findings and conclusions were forwarded with the record. As we noted in our March 11th order, these applications have been pending in the trial court on remand for over two years. This delay is unreasonable. These applications will continue to be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 45 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 75 days of the date of this order. No extensions of time shall be granted.

Filed: November 25, 2009

Do not publish

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.