EX PARTE HENRY WILSON THIGPEN (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 
OF TEXAS 

NOS. WR-72,422-01; WR-72,422-02; WR-72,422-03; WR-72,422-04 
EX PARTE HENRY WILSON THIGPEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NOS. 43893A; 43894A; 43895A; 43976A

IN THE 400TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.
O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault of a public servant and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment; evading arrest and sentenced to five years' imprisonment; assault domestic violence and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment; and violation of a protective order and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Thigpen v. State, Nos. 14-07-10; 14-07-11; 14-07-12; and 14-07-13 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th], delivered September 27, 2007).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and failed to notify him of his right to file pro se petitions for discretionary review.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide appellate counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant's appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed . The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether counsel informed Applicant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 19, 2009

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.