Jon Roozbeh Vazeen, AKA Hassan Vazin v. Michelle Smith Vazin - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part (Concurring/Dissenting)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description:
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Phillip R. Robinson
I concur with the majority s observation that [g]iven the deficiencies in Husband[ s] brief, we do not have the []ability to reach the substantive issues. If we cannot reach the substantive issues and I agree we cannot I can only conclude that Husband s appeal is devoid of merit or . . . has no reasonable chance of success. Am. Gen. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Goss et al., No E2010-01710-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 1326234 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Apr. 7, 2011) (Susano, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Hence, by definition, this is a frivolous appeal. I would remand this case to the trial court for the purpose of holding a hearing to determine just damages pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 27-1-122 (2000).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.