Mahoney v. The Muhler Company, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court J. Daniel Mahoney, Respondent, v. The Muhler Company, Inc. and Henry Hay III, in his individual capacity, Petitioners. Appellate Case No. 2020-000370 Appeal from Charleston County Bentley Price, Circuit Court Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2021-MO-004 Heard April 13, 2021 – Filed April 21, 2021 DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Andrew K. Epting Jr. and Jaan G. Rannik, both of Epting & Rannik, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners. Clayton B. McCullough, of McCullough Khan, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' order dated October 25, 2019, granting Respondent's motion to dismiss Petitioners' appeal. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.