State v. Tucker
Annotate this CaseTHE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lawrence Tucker, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Calhoun County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Opinion No. 26746
Heard November 30, 2009 – Filed December
7, 2009
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia, and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: This Court granted Lawrence Tucker’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Tucker, 376 S.C. 412, 656 S.E.2d 403 (Ct. App. 2008), in which the Court of Appeals affirmed Tucker’s plea of guilty involving an alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD). After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES, BEATTY, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.