Dawson v. State of South Carolina
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Edward N. Dawson, Respondent,
v.
State of South Carolina, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Charleston County
Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2008-MO-042
Submitted October 22, 2008 Filed October
27, 2008
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Matthew J. Friedman, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur. KITTREDGE, J., not participating.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.