State v. Segrain
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the superior court declaring Defendant to be a probation violator and sentencing Defendant to the nine years remaining on his suspended sentence, holding that there was no error or abuse of discretion.
On appeal, Defendant argued that the order to serve the nine years remaining on his suspended sentence was improperly based on the new charges alone, without proper attention being given to the original conviction for which he was on probation. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the hearing justice acted within her discretion by executing the full nine years of Defendant's original suspended sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.