State v. Mendez
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 316 July 31, 2019 695 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMANDA MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 17CR55768; A167353 Thomas M. Hart, Judge. Submitted June 6, 2019. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Hadlock, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. 696 State v. Mendez PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, entered after a conditional guilty plea. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence discovered in the course of a warrantless search that, according to defendant, was not justified by an exception to the warrant requirement and violated Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The evidence that defendant sought to suppress was found during a search of her person and purse that happened at the county courthouse pursuant to an inventory policy that applies to arrestees and inmates. Defendant argues that she was neither an “arrestee” nor an “inmate” for purpose of the inventory policy. The state concedes the error. We agree that, under the circumstances presented here, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress; we accept the state’s concession and reverse and remand. Reversed and remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
