State v. Maipi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
764 October 19, 2016 No. 513 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GIOVANNI NASON MAIPI, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C131202CR; A157810 Eric Butterfield, Judge. Submitted June 17, 2016. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Auten, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Shorr, Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 281 Or App 764 (2016) 765 PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and luring a minor, ORS 167.057. He was sentenced to 300 months in prison and lifetime post-prison supervision. We write to address only defendant’s assignment of error regarding the imposition of $6,000 in court-appointed attorney fees. We reject defendant’s remaining assignments of error without written discussion. As to the attorney fees, defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error when it ordered him to pay those fees because the record contains no evidence of his ability to pay them. The state concedes that the trial court’s imposition of attorney fees constitutes plain error under our decision in State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (holding that the imposition of court-appointed attorney fees is plain error where the record is silent as to the defendant’s ability to pay the fees). We agree that the trial court committed plain error, accept the state’s concession, and conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error in this case for the reasons stated in Coverstone—viz., the gravity of the error, the length of defendant’s prison term, and the lack of any evidence of financial resources. Id. at 716-17. Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
