State v. Juarez-Hernandez
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED: December 30, 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BENITO JUAREZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C132448CR A157764 Eric Butterfield, Judge. Submitted on November 17, 2015. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Eric Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Judge, and Allen, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. 1 PER CURIAM 2 Defendant was convicted, after a bench trial, of one count of sexual abuse 3 in the first degree, ORS 163.427 (Count 1), and sentenced to 75 months' imprisonment.1 4 Among other terms, he also was ordered to pay $1,144 in court-appointed attorney fees. 5 On appeal, he assigns error to the imposition of attorney fees. He acknowledges that he 6 did not preserve his claim of error but contends that we should exercise our discretion 7 under ORAP 5.45(1) to correct it as plain error, as we have done in similar 8 circumstances, because the record contains no evidence to support a finding that 9 defendant "is or may be able" to pay the fees. See ORS 151.505(3) ("The court may not 10 require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay 11 the costs."); ORS 161.665(4) ("The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs 12 under this section unless the defendant is or may be able to pay them."). The state 13 concedes that the imposition of fees was plainly erroneous under our decision in State v. 14 Pendergrapht, 251 Or App 630, 634, 284 P3d 573 (2012) ("A court cannot impose fees 15 based on pure speculation that a defendant has funds to pay the fees or may acquire them 16 in the future."). We agree and accept the state's concession. Furthermore, for the reasons 17 stated in State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 717, 320 P3d 670 (2014)--viz., the gravity 18 of the error, the length of defendant's prison term, and the lack of any evidence of 19 financial resources--we conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct 1 The court acquitted defendant of another count of first-degree sexual abuse (Count 2) and dismissed a third count of the same offense (Count 3) on the state's motion at the close of the state's case. 1 1 the error in this case. See also, e.g., State v. Fleet, 270 Or App 246, 347 P3d 345 (2015) 2 (reversing as plain error $980 in court-appointed attorney fees based on amount of fees, 3 60-month prison term, and lack of evidence in the record suggesting that defendant would 4 be able to pay the fees). 5 6 Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
