State v. Withnell

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED: November 07, 2012 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHELLE WITHNELL, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court CR080258 A143800 Ronald W. Stone, Judge. Submitted on March 22, 2012. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jedediah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Doug M. Petrina, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 1 PER CURIAM 2 Defendant was convicted of hindering prosecution, ORS 162.325, and 3 challenges the trial court's denial of her motion for judgment of acquittal because the 4 state did not prove the allegations of the indictment. The issue presented here is identical 5 to that in State v. Hansen, ____ Or App ____, ____ P3d ____ (Nov 7, 2012). Because 6 defendant was tried jointly with the defendant in Hansen, the evidentiary record is also 7 identical. For the reasons stated in Hansen, the trial court erred by denying defendant's 8 motion for judgment of acquittal. 9 Reversed. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.