SAIF v. Carranza-Romero

Annotate this Case

FILED: July 7, 1999

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of the Compensation of
Alfonso Carranza-Romero, Claimant.

SAIF CORPORATION and HAZEL DELL
ORCHARDS,

Petitioners,

v.

ALFONSO CARRANZA-ROMERO,

Respondent.

(97-05388; CA A101469)

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Argued and submitted on February 11, 1999.

David L. Runner argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Bruce D. Smith argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge,* and Armstrong, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Remanded for reconsideration.

*Deits, C. J., vice Warren, P. J., retired.

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation. The Board relied on its decision in Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996), which we subsequently reversed. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, __ P2d __ (1999). Whether our decision in Bundy will affect the determination of claimant's entitlement to temporary disability compensation is not apparent from the record before us. Consequently, we remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.