LOVE v. WEEKS

Annotate this Case

LOVE v. WEEKS
1954 OK 81
268 P.2d 215
Case Number: 36211
Decided: 03/16/1954
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus by the Court

¶0 Where the petition in error with record or case-made is not filed within three months after the judgment or final order made in the case and there has been no order of the trial court extending the time for appeal as provided by 12 O.S.1951 § 972, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Appeal from the District Court, Kay County, C.L. Armstrong, J.

Neal A. Sullivan, Newkirk, for plaintiff in error.

Cox & Buhrman, Blackwell, O.E. McKenzie, Tonkawa, for defendant in error.

O'NEAL, J.

¶1 Plaintiff obtained a judgment in the trial court in damages against defendant and on October 1, 1953, defendant filed his petition in error with case-made attached in this court. The order overruling the motion for new trial was entered June 5, 1953. No order was made by the trial court extending the time in which an appeal could be filed.

¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the appeal was not filed within three months after the order overruling the motion for new trial or any order extending the time for appeal. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Roof v. Fechtel, Okl. Sup., 258 P.2d 890, we said:

"Where the petition in error with record or case made is not filed within three months after the judgment or final order made in the case and there has been no order of the trial court extending the time for appeal as provided by 12 O.S. 1951 § 972, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction."

¶3 Appeal dismissed.

¶4 HALLEY, C.J., JOHNSON, V.C.J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.