JONES v. RANDOLPH

Annotate this Case

JONES v. RANDOLPH
1947 OK 190
182 P.2d 522
198 Okla. 677
Case Number: 33111
Decided: 06/17/1947
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Order on motion to vacate appointment of receiver not reviewable on petition in error and transcript.
An order on a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver is not a part of the record proper, and cannot be reviewed by this court on petition in error and transcript.

Appeal from District Court, Creek County; C.O. Beaver, Judge.

Action upon a contract by J.L. Randolph, C.R. Randolph, and A.B. Ice against Lillian E. Jones. From an order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

Glenn O. Young, of Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error.

George H. Jennings and T.L. Blakemore, both of Sapulpa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver. The appeal is by petition in error with transcript attached.

¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the alleged error in refusing to vacate the order appointing the receiver cannot be presented by transcript. The appeal must be dismissed. In First National Bank of McAlester v. McIntosh, 113 Okla. 15, 237 P. 460, we held:

"An order on a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver is not a part of the record proper, and cannot be reviewed by this court on petition in error and transcript."

See, also, Security State Bank v. Malone, 129 Okla. 112, 263 P. 655.

¶3 Appeal dismissed.

¶4 HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.