STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. TAYLOR

Annotate this Case

STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. TAYLOR
1943 OK 430
144 P.2d 114
193 Okla. 405
Case Number: 31275
Decided: 12/21/1943
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE
v.
TAYLOR et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Reversal and remand with directions in accordance with stipulation.
Where an appeal is lodged in this court and thereafter the parties by stipulation agree that the cause may be reversed and remanded with directions, this court will examine the record and said stipulation and if substantial justice is done thereby, will order the cause reversed and remanded as stipulated.

Appeal from District Court, Hughes County; Bob Howell, Judge.

Action to foreclose a mortgage by the State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office against William L. Taylor et al. From a judgment for the defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Walter Marlin and W. E. Rice, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Anglin, Stevenson & Huser, of Holdenville, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This proceeding was filed herein December 29, 1942, seeking to reverse a judgment for the defendants in the trial court.

¶2 On the 4th day of October, 1943, the parties stipulated that the cause could be reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court.

¶3 The court has examined the record and the stipulation filed herein and directs that the cause be reversed and remanded to the trial court; "that the interest in that part of the real estate involved in this action adjudged to be owned by defendants in error be held to be subject to the mortgage lien of the plaintiff in error, and to render judgment in conformity with said opinion, ordering that all of said real estate be impressed first with the mortgage lien of the plaintiff in error; that said lands be sold in conformity with the provisions of said judgment in event of failure to redeem, being offered first subject to the interest owned by defendants in error, and failing to bring sufficient to satisfy the amount of judgment, interest, attorney's fees and costs in favor of plaintiff in error, then be sold free and clear of any right, title or interest of defendants in error or any person or persons claiming any right, title, or interest by, through or under them, or any of them."

¶4 Reversed and remanded, with directions.

¶5 CORN, C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., absent.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.