PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. v. MCNEILL

Annotate this Case

PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. v. MCNEILL
1939 OK 437
95 P.2d 235
185 Okla. 574
Case Number: 29014
Decided: 10/24/1939
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. et al.
v.
McNEILL et al.

Syllabus

¶0 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION--Review of Awards by Court--Disposition of Cause Upon Confession of Error by Claimant.
In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the claimant, respondent, files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error.

Original proceeding in the Supreme Court by the Pillsbury Flour Mills Company et al. to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of George Riley MeNeill. Award vacated, with directions.

Crouch, Rhodes & Crowe, of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.
L. E. Roseboom, of Enid, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 By this proceeding the petitioner Pillsbury Flour Mills Company, employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, insurance carrier, seek to review an award of the State Industrial Commission entered November 18, 1938, in favor of George Riley McNeill, respondent, who was claimant in the State Industrial Commission, which award found that respondent was totally temporarily disabled by reason of an accidental injury and ordered payment accordingly.

¶2 One of the specifications of error in the petition for review is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the award. On March 28, 1939, respondent filed a confession of error in which it is admitted that the evidence in the record now before us might be insufficient. He suggests that the cause be remanded to the State Industrial Commission for further proceedings, but such proceeding is not authorized for such purpose.

¶3 Under the authority of Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey, 167 Okla. 417, 30 P.2d 163, upon the filing of such confession of error, the award may be vacated.

¶4 The award is vacated.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.