JIM YOUNG DRILLING CO. v. MOYER

Annotate this Case

JIM YOUNG DRILLING CO. v. MOYER
1937 OK 690
74 P.2d 113
181 Okla. 347
Case Number: 27883
Decided: 11/30/1937
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

JIM YOUNG DRILLING CO.
v.
MOYER

Syllabus

¶0 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION - Award for Permanent Partial Disability Under "Other Cases" Provision - Commutation of Portion of Award to Lump Sum for Payment of Attorney's Fee Held not Authorized Under Statute.
Under section 2, chap. 29, Sess. Laws 1933, amending section 13365, O. S. 1931, the State Industrial Commission has no authority to commute to a lump sum, for the payment of attorney fees, any portion off the latter end of an award for permanent partial disability coming under the "other cases" provision of section 13356, O. S. 1931. In such cases, the payments must be made periodically in accordance with the payment of wages of the employee.

Action in the Supreme Court by Jim Young Drilling Company et al. to review order of the Industrial Commission in favor of Charles Moyer. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Gibson & Savage, for petitioners.
Ross G. Hume, for respondents.

HURST, J.

¶1 This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, and the sole proposition urged petitioners is that the commission had no authority to commute part of an award for permanent partial disability into one lump sum for payment of attorney fees.

¶2 It is conceded that the claimant sustained an accidental personal injury while engaged in a hazardous employment as defined by the Workmen's Compensation Law and that he was furnished medical attention and paid compensation for the resulting temporary disability, which ended on February 22, 1937. The claimant was further awarded compensation for permanent partial disability commencing February 22, 1937, at the rate of $8 per week, for a period not to exceed 300 weeks. The commission further ordered that the sum of $160, "the same being 20 weeks' compensation at the rate of $8 per week, is a reasonable attorney fee"; and that said sum be "commuted to a lump sum payment off the latter end of this award and payable to the claimant's attorneys without discount. * * *"

¶3 The petitioners do not complain of the correctness of the award or the sufficiency of the evidence, but contend that the action of the commission in commuting 20 weeks' compensation off the latter end of the award to a lump sum for payment of attorney fees is contrary to the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Law, and violates sections 6 and 7 of article 2 of the Constitution of this state. It is further contended that if such action was in accordance with law and does not violate the constitutional provisions referred to, it then constitutes an abuse of discretion under the circumstances disclosed by the record.

¶4 It is not necessary to discuss the arguments presented by the petitioners attacking the action of the commission on constitutional grounds or as an abuse of discretion, for it is held in Cornhuskers Theatres, Inc., v. Foster and Industrial Commission, 181 Okla. 341, 74 P.2d 109, that by reason of the provisions of section 2, chap. 29, Sess. Laws 1933, amending section 13365, O. S. 1931, the commission has no authority to commute to lump sum, for the payment of attorney fees, any future portion of an award for permanent partial disability coming under the "other cases" provision of section 13356, O. S. 1931. The views therein expressed are decisive of this case.

¶5 The award commuting the attorney fees is vacated, and in all other respects the award is affirmed, with directions to make all payments periodically in accordance with the payment of wages of the employee.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.