BRANUM v. SKIRVING

Annotate this Case

BRANUM v. SKIRVING
1930 OK 511
293 P. 262
146 Okla. 73
Case Number: 21366
Decided: 11/18/1930
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BRANUM
v.
SKIRVING.

Syllabus

¶0 1. Appeal and Error--Nullity of Case-Made Signed and Settled Without Notice.
A case-made signed and settled without notice of the time and place of settlement, and such notice is not waived and there is no appearance by the opposite party either in person or by counsel, is a nullity and brings nothing before this court for review.
2. Same--Recital in Trial Judge's Certificate Negatived by Record.
The certificate of the trial judge to a case-made is only prima facie evidence of the facts recited therein, and where the record on its face shows the recital in such certificate to be erroneous, the facts shown by the record will control.

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Enloe V. Vernor, Judge.

Action by Ira F. Skirving against Victor E. Branum. From the judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

C. A. Summers, for plaintiff in error.
C. E. McLees, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Muskogee county rendered in an action wherein Ira F. Skirving was plaintiff and Victor E. Branum was defendant. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

¶2 The motion for new trial was overruled November 23, 1925, and time given in which to make and serve case-made. It is conceded by the parties to this appeal that the case-made was served within the time allowed by order of the court therefor, but the defendant in error now moves that the appeal be dismissed upon the grounds the case-made is a nullity and brings nothing before the court for review for the reason the case-made was settled and signed in the absence of, and without notice to the defendant in error, and without such notice having been in any manner waived.

¶3 The case-made attached to the petition in error does not show any notice was given to the defendant in error of the time and place of the settlement thereof, nor that such notice was in any manner waived; the plaintiff was not present at the time of the settlement of the case-made.

¶4 A case-made settled and signed in the absence of, and without notice to the defendant in error of the time and place of settlement and without a waiver of such a notice is a nullity and brings nothing before this court for review. Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. Green, 133 Okla. 58, 270 P. 1111, and cases therein cited. The plaintiff in error nowhere asserts that such notice was given, but urges that because the certificate of the trial court judge recites notice was given, the question presented by the motion to dismiss was adjudicated in the trial court. This question is also decided in the case of Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. Green, supra, wherein the rule is announced as follows:

"The certificate of the trial judge to a case-made is only prima facie evidence of the facts recited therein, and where the record on its face shows the recital in such certificate to be erroneous, the facts shown by the record will control. "

See, also, Town v. Crawford, 106 Okla. 254, 234 P. 208, and cases therein cited.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.