BALL v. LYNCH

Annotate this Case

BALL v. LYNCH
1926 OK 626
250 P. 537
122 Okla. 24
Case Number: 17497
Decided: 07/20/1926
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BALL
v.
LYNCH et al.

Syllabus

ΒΆ0 1. Appeal and Error--Time for Making and Serving Case-Made not Extended by Unauthorized Motion for New Trial. The filing and determination of a motion for a new trial is not necessary to authorize this court to review an order of the trial court made in disposing of a motion, by one of the parties, to set aside a writ or order of the trial court, and a motion for a new trial is unauthorized in such proceeding and does not extend the time in which to make and serve case-made.
2. Same--Time for Appeal from Final Order. A proceeding in this court to reverse a final order of the district court must be commenced within six months of the rendition of the final order complained of, else this court cannot acquire jurisdiction, and the appeal will be dismissed. The time runs from the rendition of the final order. Ginn et al. v. Knight, 106 Okla. 4, 232 P. 936.

O'Meara & Silverman, for plaintiff in error.
C. Dale Wolfe and Hagan & Garvin, for defendants in error.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.