BOND v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF SAPULPA

Annotate this Case

BOND v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF SAPULPA
1926 OK 554
251 P. 997
123 Okla. 52
Case Number: 16622
Decided: 06/15/1926
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BOND et al.
v.
AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF SAPULPA.

Syllabus by the Court

¶0 A judgment reached by the court in the trial of a law action, without the intervention of a jury, will not be reversed on appeal, if there is any competent evidence which reasonably tends to support the findings of fact in favor of the plaintiff.

Record examined; held to be sufficient to support judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 4.

Appeal from District Court, Creek County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge.

Action by the American National Bank of Sapulpa against Minnie Bond and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Lafayette Walker, of Okmulgee, for plaintiffs in error.
Eugene B. Smith, of Sapulpa, for defendant in error.

STEPHENSON, C.

¶1 This suit involves an action by the defendant in error on a promissory note against the plaintiffs in error. The trial of the cause resulted in judgment for the defendant in error. The plaintiffs in error perfected their appeal and submit errors for reversal: That the judgment is contrary to the facts and the law.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.