HAYS v. HUDGENS

Annotate this Case

HAYS v. HUDGENS
1924 OK 809
236 P. 6
110 Okla. 45
Case Number: 13901
Decided: 09/30/1924
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HAYS
v.
HUDGENS.

¶0 Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Marshall County; Geo. S. March, Judge. Action between Louisa Hays, by J. W. Johnson, guardian, and C. F. Hudgens. From the judgment, the former appeals. Affirmed.

Minter & McClendon and Geo. E. Rider, for plaintiff in error.
C. A. Coakley and Thomas Norman, for defendant in error.

JONES, C.

¶1 The facts in this case are practically identical with, and governed by the same rules of law, as the case of Louisa Hays v. Wood et al., 110 Okla. 45, 236 P. 3, wherein the judgment of the trial court was affirmed and a discussion of the issues involved, and citations of authorities will be found, and are here referred to and adopted as the opinion in this case, and we therefore recommend that this case be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.