HASTINGS v. MORRIS

HASTINGS v. MORRIS
1923 OK 1151
221 P. 490
96 Okla. 249
Case Number: 14729
Decided: 12/18/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HASTINGS
v.
MORRIS.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Absence of Answer Brief--Reversal.
Where defendant in error has failed to file a brief or offer any excuse therefor, and the brief of plaintiff in error reasonably sustains the assignments of error, the judgment may be reversed.

Vance, Bliss & Paden and W. W. Hastings, for plaintiff in error.
E. B. Arnold, for defendant in error.

McNEILL, J.

¶1 This is an appeal from the district court of Cherokee county. There was judgment rendered for the defendant, motion for new trial filed and overruled, and appeal properly perfected in this court. The plaintiff in error has filed his brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and defendant in error has neither filed brief nor offered excuse for failure so to do. The brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, and under the numerous authorities of this court, this court is not required to search the record to find a theory upon which the Judgment may be sustained, but it may be reversed in accordance with the petition of plaintiff in error. For the reasons stated, the Judgment of the court is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered and grant the plaintiff in error a new trial.