CRAIG & WALL v. PLUMMER

Annotate this Case

CRAIG & WALL v. PLUMMER
1923 OK 813
219 P. 313
93 Okla. 99
Case Number: 11015
Decided: 10/23/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CRAIG & WALL
v.
PLUMMER.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Affirmance -- Judgment on Supersedeas Bond. Where the plaintiff in error causes supersedeas bond to be approved and tiled in a cause on appeal to this court, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed on motion of the appellee, judgment will be entered in this court against the sureties on the bond.

John V. Roberts, for plaintiff in error.
C. B. Wood and Swindall & Wybrant, for defendant in error.

STEPHENSON, C.

¶1 Heretofore L. Plummer recovered judgment in the district court of Major county, in a cross-action against Craig & Wall, a partnership, for the principal sum of $ 770, and the costs of the action. Craig & Wall perfected this appeal from said judgment to this court. The plaintiffs in error caused supersedeas bond to be approved and filed in the cause about the 11th day of September, 1919, in the principal sum of $ 1,540 with J. B. Hays and C. C. Seese, as sureties. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed on appeal by this court. The defendant in error has filed his motion, with copy of the supersedeas bond thereto attached, praying judgment against the sureties, which is allowed. Judgment is therefore entered in this court against L. B. Hays and C. E. Seese, as sureties on the supersedeas bond in the principal sum of $ 770, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. per annum, from the date of judgment rendered in the trial court, and costs, for which execution may issue.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.