TWINE v. MAEHL

TWINE v. MAEHL
1923 OK 740
218 P. 1056
94 Okla. 45
Case Number: 11983
Decided: 10/02/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

TWINE et al.
v.
MAEHL.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Where the plaintiff in error files no brief as required by Rule 7 of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Disney, Wheeler & Barker, for plaintiffs in error.
B. E. Nussbaum and Earl Bohannon, for defendant in error.

PINKHAM, C.

 
¶1 This is an appeal from the action of the district court of Muskogee county, Okla., in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant in error. The cause was duly reached for hearing upon the docket of this court, submitted and assigned for the preparation of an opinion. Upon an examination of the record it appears that neither party has filed a brief in the case, although the time for so doing has long since expired.

¶2 In these circumstances the appeal of the plaintiffs in error must be dismissed for want of prosecution.